Dashboard

Interview breakdown

Your average

80

Selected candidate

88

Gap to close

8 pts

Mostly from one question

Q1 · Technical · Round 2

Design a real-time collaborative comment system for a document editor.

Your score78

Your answer: Proposed WebSockets with optimistic UI, a React context for comment state, and a REST fallback for history.

What worked

Clear client architecture and excellent optimistic-update reasoning.

How to level up

Didn't address conflict resolution or how comments anchor when text is edited. Mention CRDTs or operational transforms.
Q2 · Technical · Round 2

How would you model permissions for teams, projects and shared links?

Your score61

Your answer: Suggested a role field on the user and checking roles in the API.

What worked

Understood the need for server-side enforcement.

How to level up

Roles on a user don't scale to multi-team access. Use a membership join table with scoped roles, and separate link tokens.
Q3 · Frontend · Round 3You outscored the selected candidate

A dashboard re-renders slowly with 5,000 rows. Walk us through fixing it.

Your score94

Your answer: Profiled first, found context-triggered re-renders, split state, memoised rows, then virtualised the list.

What worked

Measured before optimising — the panel's favourite answer of the day.

How to level up

Could add how you'd prevent regressions (performance budgets in CI).
Q4 · Behavioural · Round 4

Tell us about a time you disagreed with a product decision.

Your score85

Your answer: Pushed back on a launch date with data on error rates; negotiated a phased rollout.

What worked

Data-backed, collaborative, and showed a real outcome.

How to level up

Quantify the result — e.g. "cut incident rate by 40%" lands harder than "it went well".